Penn Today Online

Related Links

Find a Cardiac Specialist:

-

Physicians

-

Surgeons

Make a Referral Online or call 1-800-789-PENN
Penn Cardiac Care
Patient Education Articles about the Heart
 

 


 Penn Today Online

Current Issue
Robotic Surgery for Gynecologic Conditions and Cancer
Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration
Distraction Osteogenesis
Calypso® System Tracking and Target Localization
Physician Announcements
Archive of Articles
 
Subscribe to the Newsletter
Newsletter RSS Feed RSS feed
   

Home
Penn Today Online
Referral Directory
Physician Tools
Urgent Patient Transfer
Research
Upcoming CMEs

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Successful for Heart Failure Patients

September / October 2004

Penn Cardiac Care recently participated in the MIRACLE (Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation) study that evaluated the safety and therapeutic benefits of the Medtronic InSync™ atrial synchronous biventricular pacing device and accompanying software and pacing leads in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The results of the study showed that patients who used the InSync system improved exercise capacity, their New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and quality of life.

The FDA-approved device is surgically implanted under the skin on the upper chest and is similar to a pacemaker. CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three leads that are inserted through the veins in the heart. In combination with standard drug therapy, CRT is believed to resynchronize the heart, help the lower chambers of the heart beat simultaneously in a normal sequence and treat ventricular dysynchrony. The randomized, double-blind parallel controlled study evaluated 453 heart failure patients. Patients were implanted with the InSync system and then three days later randomized to either have the CRT turned on or off for six-months.

Patients who utilized the new system improved their exercise capacity by an increase in six-minute hall walk distance of fifty meters or greater. And, compared to baseline, 68 percent of patients in the treatment group experienced an improvement in NYHA functional class by one or more classes at six months, versus 38 percent in the control group. Improvements of one or more classes indicate an improved ability to perform the activities of daily life. According to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, patients receiving CRT (who were already receiving standard drug therapy) felt better as a result of treatment. Finally, improvements in cardiac function were noted, including, reduction in systolic and diastolic volumes, increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and reduction in severity of mitral valve regurgitation.

“The MIRACLE trial showed for the first time that poor heart function could be reversed and there was a relationship between the EF changes, which measures the heart’s pumping ability, and symptomatic improvement,” says Martin G. St. John Sutton, MBBS, cardiovascular medicine specialist and director of cardiovascular imaging at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and a principal investigator for the MIRACLE study. “The study clearly shows the heart reduces in size on therapy and improving heart function. The unique aspect of this biventricular pacemaker is that it coordinates the electric activation sequence and improves inter and intra ventricular contraction,” adds Dr. St. John Sutton.

There are more than 400,000 patients diagnosed with heart failure in the United States each year. For many of these individuals quality of life is severely limited and many are too fatigued to participate in daily activities. The treatment of heart failure has been primarily limited to pharmaceutical interventions with ACE inhibitors, Beta adrenergic receptor blockers, diuretics and vasodilators. And although these medications have been very effective at relieving symptoms, they have not reversed cardiac function. Other treatment options for select patients with heart failure may include heart transplant or destination therapy with mechanical devices.

As of April 2004, more than a hundred patients have received the pacemaker at Penn and according to Dr. St. John Sutton many more could find sustained improvement via biventricular pacing. The best candidates are patients who are:

  • not eligible for a heart transplant
  • on maximum medical therapy and
  • still symptomatic.

“The trial found that patients with non-ischemic coronary myopathy improved significantly, but those with non-ischemic coronary myopathy did even better, which was surprising because these hearts are usually the largest with the worst function,” explains Dr. St. John Sutton.

“For some patients the results have been extraordinary. One patient who before receiving the pacemaker primarily went from his bed to a chair, has since returned to work as a lawyer, playing golf and traveling.”

Some people with heart failure are also at risk for extremely fast and life-threatening heart rhythms. One answer to this problem is a combination of CRT and an internal cardiac defibrillator (ICD). Although still under investigation, the use of CRT plus ICD is thought to help the lower two chambers of the heart beat in a normal sequence and treat ventricular arrhythmias by automatically detecting the life-threatening arrhythmias and correcting the heart's rhythm.

 


Referring Physicians: To speak with a Penn physician or refer a patient, contact PennHealth through the secure online referral form or by calling
1-800-789-PENN (7366).

   
   

 

About UPHS   Contact Us   Site Map   Privacy Statement   Legal Disclaimer   Terms of Use

The University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 800-789-PENN © 2008, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania