Surgery for Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is
epidemic and is now the leading cancer killer
among both men and women. We consider excellence
in surgery for lung cancer to be at the core
of the mission of the Thoracic Surgery service
at Penn. Surgery for non-small cell lung cancer
makes up more of our surgical volume than any
other category of procedure (Chart 1), and this
places us among the busiest centers for lung
cancer surgery in the world.
Among the benefits of our expertise is a dramatically lower
length of stay. Despite our case complexity, Penn's average is
6.0 days versus the regional average of 9.0 days.*
*Fiscal Year 2004
Source: Strategic Planning's
analysis of discharge data from
PHC4 and NJDOH
|
|
Patients come to
Penn for surgical treatment of lung cancer not
only from the Philadelphia region, but also from
across the nation, and we believe our results
set the standard for the treatment of patients
with this condition.

Chart 1
|
|
A guiding philosophy in our management of resectable lung cancer
is to achieve the highest cure rate possible, while maximally
preserving functioning lung parenchyma. This
approach can only be practiced by surgeons
skilled in sleeve lobectomy and
experienced enough to know when lobectomy
will provide an equivalent chance of cure as
the more morbid pneumonectomy. This
reduces both early complications and longterm
disability due to dyspnea.
In the last year, the pneumonectomy rate at
the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
(number of pneumoctomies/total number of
resections for lung cancer) was less than
one-half that of the average rate at all other
hospitals in Pennsylvania (Chart 2). Our low
rate of pneumonectomy and our overall low complication
rate at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
allows us to maintain the lowest length of stay
for the “major thoracic” category of discharges
among hospitals in the Philadelphia region*.

Chart 2
|
|
Another skill that we at Penn have, as
subspecialists in thoracic surgery, is the ability
to perform pulmonary segmentectomy. This
technique, which involves removal of the
smallest anatomic unit of lung tissue — less
than an entire lobe — will often allow
an adequate cancer resection to be performed
in patients with severe emphysema who in other
institutions might not have been considered to
be operative candidates. The ability to perform
segmentectomies as well as the application of
the concept of lung volume reduction (see next
section on surgery for emphysema) allows us to
extend safe surgical resection of lung cancer
to many patients with even severe chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease. Thoracoscopy has played a
progressively larger role in the management of
lung cancer, and Penn thoracic surgeons continue
to be in this vanguard.
Thoracoscopy was initially used only
as a diagnostic procedure in lung cancer, but as it has become
clear that stage I lung cancer can be appropriately managed
by thoracoscopic lobectomy, we have
adopted this approach in selected patients. The number of cases of
thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy performed
at Penn has increased exponentially in the
last several years (Chart 3), and we expect it
to continue to rise in the future. In addition,
many of our lung cancer operations are
performed through totally muscle-sparing,
axillary thoracotomy incisions which are
both cosmetically appealing and preserve
arm strength.

Chart 3
|
|
As in all areas of thoracic surgery, Penn
surgeons have not only skillfully applied current knowledge in the field of lung cancer
surgery; they have also advanced the field
by innovation and dissemination of clinical
results. Among the areas of lung cancer
surgery in which we have published in the
past several years are: the role of lobectomy
with pulmonary artery resection and reconstruction
as an alternative to pneumonectomy, levels of pain and return to
physical functioning following muscle-sparing
versus lateral thoracotomy, and the effect
of various adjuvant therapies in combination
with surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.
|